Exploring disabled students

Rafiduraida Abdul Rahman

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Rafiduraida Abdul Rahman
Additional Authors :	Hariyaty Ab Wahid Wan Salmuni Wan Mustaffa Suriani Mohd Rhouse Norlaile Salleh Hudin
Title :	Exploring disabled students

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The aim of this research is to explore the crucial dimensions of service quality experienced by disabled students at Malaysian HEIs. The Malaysian public universities were selected as a research context. This research involved disabled students registered at selected Malaysian public universities. Purposive sampling technique was utilized for selection of the respondents. Face-toface interview was conducted to gather the data. Thematic technique was performed to analyze the data. Result from the interview indicated that the disabled students were less satisfied with service experience offered by Malaysian public universities. The results also revealed that four dimensions need to give extra attention to improve the quality of disabled students’ service experience at Malaysian HEIs. The service dimensions include physical facilities, access to learning, communication, and empathy. This research will give a positive impact to the university’s management in providing service quality according to the disabled students’ needs.

References

1. Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305–328.

2. Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581.

3. Anderson, E. (1973). Consumer Dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 38–44.

4. Abdul Munir, I., Mazdi, M., Mohd Noor, D. & Abdul Hadi, B. (2015). Penyediaan kemudahan orang kurang upaya (OKU) di masjid-masjid: Kajian kes di masjid-masjid daerah Batang Padang. Al-Hikmah. 7(1) 2015: 62-78

5. Bayraktaroglu, G., & Atrek, B. (2010). Testing the superiority and dimensionality of SERVQUAL vs SERVPERF in higher education. Quality Management Journal, 17(1), 47–59.

6. Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32.

7. Brostrand, H.L. (2006). Tilting at windmills: Changing attitudes towards people with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation. 72 (1): 4-9.

8. Brodwin, M.G., Orange, L.M. 2002. Attitude towards disability. Dalam J. D. Andrew & C.W. Faubion (Eds.), Rehabilitation Services: An Introduction For The Human Services Professional: 145-173. Osage Beach, MO: Aspen Professional Services.

9. Cronin, J Joseph, & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL : Reconciling performancebased and measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 125–131. Data Management Unit, Ministry of Higher education. (2017). Data for Public HEI for Disabled Students' Enrolment 2017. Malaysia.

10. Hazlin Falina. R. & Safura, A. S. (2017). Halangan fasiliti pelajar orang kurang upaya (OKU) di Institusi pengajian tinggi Di Lembah Klang. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly And Disabled. 2 (June), 94-99.

11. Hazlin Falina, R., Wan Amizah, W. M. & Maizatul Haizan, M. (2015). Realiti dan Kesamarataan Hak Orang Kelainan Upaya (OKU) di Malaysia. International Conferences on Media and Communication (MENTION 2015).

12. Hasnah, T., Tajul Arifin, M., Mohd Hanafi, M. Y., Mohd Mokhtar, T. & Nur Hazwani, H. (2010). Pengetahuan dan sikap rakan sebaya terhadap pelajar kurang upaya di sebuah IPTA di Malaysia. Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2 (2010), 21-32.

13. Holloway, S. (2001). The experience of higher education from the perspective of disabled students. Disability & Society, 16, 597–615.

14. Hall, J. & Tinklin, T. (1998). Students First: The Experiences of Disabled Studentsin Higher Education. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

15. Konur, O. (2000). Creating enforceable civil rights for disabled students in higher education: an institutional theory perspective. Disability & Society, 15(7), 1041–1063

16. Longoria, L., Marini I. (2006). Perceptions of children’s attitudes towards peers with a severe physical disability. Journal of Rehabilitation 72 (3): 19-25.

17. McCarthy, M. & Campbell, N. J. (1993). Serving disabled students: Faculty needs and attitudes. NASPA Journal, 30(2): 120-125.

18. Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development (2016). Disabled Action Plan, 2016-2022. Malaysia.

19. Ministry Of Higher Education (2016). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher education). Malaysia.

20. Nurul Hariza, H. (2012) Aspirasi kerjaya dalam kalangan pelajar bermasalah pendengaran di politeknik. Tesis tidak diterbitkan.Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, Melaka, Malaysia.

21. Olshavsky, R. W., & Miller, J. A. (1972). Consumer expectations, product performance and perceived product quality. Journal of Marketing, 9(Febuary), 19–21.

22. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall 1985), 41–50.

23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

24. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 4(Winter 1991), 420–450.

25. Reed, M. J., Kennett, D. J., & Emond, M. (2015). The influence of reasons for attending university on university experience: A comparison between students with and without disabilities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16, 225–236.

26. Redpath, J., Kearney, P., Nicholl, P., Mulvenna, M., Wallace, J., & Martin, S. (2013). A qualitative study of the lived experiences of disabled post-transition students in higher education institutions in Northern Ireland. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1334–1350.

27. Samsuri, N. A. (2012). Penyediaan fasiliti OKU di Sekolah Menengah Pendidikan Khas Vokasional Indahpura. Masters thesis, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

28. Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2010). Service quality in higher education – a review and research agenda. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(2), 259–272.

29. Mustaffa, W. S. W., Rahman, R. A., Wahid, H. A., Rhouse, S. M., & Hudin, N. S. (2019). Exploring Disabled Students’ Service Quality Dimensions: A Case of Malaysian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(2), 239–248.

30. Vaughan, E. & Woodruffe-Burton, H. (2011). The disabled student experience: does the SERVQUAL scale measure up? Journal of Quality Assurance in Education. 19(1), 28-49

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page